Good Logico-Linguistic Query Towards Fundamentals off Physics: Area I

Good Logico-Linguistic Query Towards Fundamentals off Physics: Area I

However, it remains offered to the viewer means that it functions, the essence regarding emptiness

Scientific study, try out methods, show and you may perceptions is created regarding mind, plus creativeness and you may word and you will style programming. Suitable reporting out of abilities is additionally vital. Particularly in theoretic physics, linguistic expertise and you may carefulness if you’re composing are getting a far more clicking you need from inside the the brand new subjects at limits out of existing training. There are individuals from other industries who happen to be ready to misunderstand and you may spark so many discourses/conclusions; they write books away from a few bytes of information Bisexual dating app such “yes/no/maybe”; therefore, nonscience or occult misinformation is offered, examples of and therefore are plentiful on areas from unique relativity idea and you may quantum physics. For this reason, research ought not to utilize the phrases one supported brand new Paleolithic brain. Category: Standard Science and you can Values

Trappist-step one Star Program

The newest James Webb Place Telescope (JWST) will soon transcend exactly what the Hubble could have been in a position to mention. Certainly its first targets shall be new TRAPPIST-step one celebrity program during the Aquarius. It essay examines as to why that puny purple dwarf can be so fascinating, and just why the fresh search for alien lives models age. Category: General Science and Thinking

Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are , but used as to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy